Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Should You Use AI to Write Your Web3 Resume? Pros and Cons

Should You Use AI to Write Your Web3 Resume? Pros and Cons

Should You Use AI to write your Web3 resume? Thatโ€™s the question I found myself asking more and more during interviews last year. Iโ€™ve been in crypto recruitment for years nowโ€”since the ICO days, when Web3 job titles were basically made up on the spot. Iโ€™ve seen the industry evolve from hype-driven chaos to something much more mature (well, most days).

But recently, something’s shifted again. Itโ€™s not just about the candidates anymore. It’s about how they’re presenting themselvesโ€”and more and more, Iโ€™m reading resumes that feelโ€ฆ off. Polished to the point of soulless. Buzzwords stacked like Jenga blocks. Accomplishments that sound almost too impressive.

And thatโ€™s when it hit me: people are using AI to write their resumes.

Which, to be fair, makes a lot of sense. Tools like ChatGPT can crank out a perfectly formatted, keyword-rich CV in seconds. But should you use AI to write your Web3 resume? Letโ€™s dive into the pros and consโ€”from someone who’s reviewed hundreds of them.

Pro: AI Can Help You Break Through the Noise

Letโ€™s face itโ€”recruiters skim. Especially in crypto, where job descriptions are vague, and roles shift fast. Having a resume thatโ€™s clean, sharp, and keyword-optimised can be the difference between getting an interview or getting ghosted.

AI is brilliant at formatting, rewording, and aligning your experience with the job spec. I once worked with a candidate who was a Solidity dev at a small DeFi protocol. Super smart, but his resume read like a Reddit post. After running it through AI, we tightened everything upโ€”used language like โ€œcontributed to smart contract auditsโ€ instead of โ€œchecked for bugsโ€, and boomโ€”he started landing calls.

Itโ€™s especially handy for non-native English speakers or folks shifting into Web3 from traditional tech. If it helps you tell your story more clearly, thatโ€™s a win.

Con: It Can Strip Away Your Voice

But hereโ€™s the rubโ€”AI doesnโ€™t know you. It canโ€™t capture your vibe, your journey, or the weird, wonderful stuff that makes you a great cultural fit.

I remember a candidate whoโ€™d built a side project during the Terra collapseโ€”a dashboard that tracked ecosystem risk. Super niche, super cool. His AI-written resume buried it under โ€œdeveloped analytical tools in volatile market conditions.โ€ Likeโ€ฆ what? That story shouldโ€™ve been front and centre!

Hiring in Web3 isnโ€™t just about skills. Itโ€™s about curiosity, initiative, and your ability to navigate chaos with a grin. If your resume feels like it was copy-pasted from LinkedIn GPT, Iโ€™ll assume youโ€™re playing it safe. And in this space? Safe doesn’t always stand out.

Pro: Itโ€™s a Great Starting Point (If You Tweak It)

Hereโ€™s the truth: Iโ€™m not anti-AI. Iโ€™m just pro-authenticity.

Using AI to generate a first draft? Totally fine. In fact, it can help you see your own experience more objectively. One candidate I worked with was underselling herself massively. After feeding her bullet points into ChatGPT, she realised her freelance gigs actually added up to a full-stack product lead role. That reframing changed everything.

But she didnโ€™t stop there. She took the AIโ€™s draft and rewrote it in her own voice. Kept it human. Added context. Injected personality.

Thatโ€™s the sweet spot.

Con: Recruiters Can Tellโ€”and Some Donโ€™t Like It

This is the part nobody wants to hear, but itโ€™s true: experienced recruiters can usually spot an AI-written resume. There’s a certain cadenceโ€”flawless grammar, vague impact statements, and a tendency to list โ€œcollaborated cross-functionallyโ€ like it’s a hobby.

Some hiring managers donโ€™t mind. Others see it as lazy. Personally, I donโ€™t care how you write your resume, as long as it’s real. But if youโ€™re applying for a community role or anything front-facing, your personality has to shine through. If AI is muting that, youโ€™re shooting yourself in the foot.

Also, Iโ€™ve seen AI hallucinate. One resume listed a candidate as having worked with โ€œPolygon Labs on ecosystem integrations.โ€ He hadnโ€™t. It had pulled that line from a Medium post heโ€™d written. That couldโ€™ve been a dealbreaker.

So… Should You Use AI?

Well, should you use AI to write your Web3 resume? Hereโ€™s my take:

  • Use it as a tool, not a crutch. Get help with structure, grammar, and toneโ€”but donโ€™t let it write your story for you.

  • Bring your weirdness. Web3 is full of oddballs, builders, and rebels. If your resume reads like corporate PR, youโ€™re blending in, not standing out.

  • Double-check everything. Especially if you’re using plugins or extensions. I’ve seen AI get creative in ways that arenโ€™t helpful.

  • Treat it like a co-pilot. Youโ€™re the writer. AI is just here to help you fly fasterโ€”not replace the journey.

Final Thoughts (Over a Coffee)

Look, I get it. Writing about yourself is hard. Especially in an industry where titles are fuzzy, projects move fast, and imposter syndrome is practically a rite of passage.

But your resume is your story. Whether youโ€™ve launched a DAO, written smart contracts, or just spent months rabbit-holing into ZK proofsโ€”own it. Use AI to polish the words, but let your voice lead.

Because in Web3, weโ€™re not just hiring skills. Weโ€™re hiring passion, hustle, and people who genuinely care about the mission.

And no AI can fake that.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Looking for your next role?
Looking to hire?