
By Spectrum Search – Senior Correspondent
Global markets headed into the year’s close with a mixture of optimism and hesitation. The US Federal Reserve delivered its third consecutive rate cut, fuelling expectations of continued monetary easing, while the Bank of Japan (BoJ) raised interest rates for the first time in three decades—a symbolic end to its era of near-zero borrowing costs. Inflation data also came in softer than expected, lifting investor sentiment. On paper, the macro backdrop appears increasingly benign. Yet, despite these developments, Bitcoin (BTC) has failed to ignite the kind of rally many traders anticipated.
As of 23 December 2025, Bitcoin is up roughly 4% since mid-December, briefly touching $90,000 on 22 December before losing momentum. The price action remains choppy, and the whales of 2021’s bull market seem conspicuously absent. For blockchain analysts and crypto recruiters, it’s a curious disconnect: a softer macro environment, but muted risk appetite across digital assets. What’s at play here?
November’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) data appeared to deliver the headline every central banker wanted to see: headline inflation at 2.7% year-over-year (versus the 3.1% forecast) and core inflation easing to 2.6%. It marked the lowest core reading since 2021—a potential sign that the US economy is finally cooling without tipping into recession.
Yet, beneath the surface, economists are cautioning restraint. Due to the six-week US government shutdown earlier this quarter, October CPI data was never officially released. Portions of November’s dataset relied on modelled estimates rather than actual market readings—particularly in shelter and services categories. This contamination of data, as analysts call it, is one reason why policymakers are not declaring victory just yet.
Federal Reserve Governor John Williams reinforced this caution in a 19 December address. He described the inflation print as “encouraging” but warned that it was “distorted” by missing data. His assessment that monetary policy is now “well balanced” and that there is “no immediate need” for further cuts effectively pours cold water on hopes of an aggressive easing cycle in early 2026. Investors, for their part, appear to be awaiting a clean January dataset before re-risking positions.
While rate cuts have technically softened conditions, they have not yet reshaped the real yield environment that governs long-term risk appetite. The US 10-year TIPS yield, a key measure of inflation-adjusted return, remains near 1.9%—far above the negative real rate backdrop of 2020 and 2021 that catalysed Bitcoin’s surge to $68,000. In other words, there may be liquidity, but it’s not cheap liquidity.
The Fed officially ended its quantitative tightening programme on 1 December, a shift some misread as the beginning of a new quantitative easing cycle. In reality, balance sheet data suggest a far more restrained stance. As of 18 December, the Fed’s assets stood at approximately $6.56 trillion—down about $350 billion from a year prior. Williams was quick to clarify that ongoing Treasury purchases are purely “technical,” aimed at liquidity management rather than macro stimulation.
In market terms: liquidity is no longer shrinking, but it isn’t swelling either. Real yields remain firmly positive, leaving long-duration assets—Bitcoin included—priced under tighter financial conditions than traders might wish.
Across the Pacific, the Bank of Japan’s decision to raise rates to 0.75% has made headlines as the country’s first substantial policy shift in three decades. Governor Kazuo Ueda characterised the move as a step toward “normalisation,” emphasising a gradual approach. Japanese 10-year government bond yields climbed to their highest point since 1999, yet markets remained surprisingly calm. The yen even softened slightly afterwards—signalling traders believe the BoJ will move cautiously.
However, global macro strategists are watching closely. For years, Japan’s ultra-low borrowing costs financed global risk trades via the yen carry trade. Should rising Japanese yields push investors to unwind those leveraged strategies, it could trigger broad-based de-risking. In that sense, the system’s anchor has been loosened but not yet cut loose—leaving a latent risk that continues to hover over high-beta assets like Bitcoin.
This measured tightening has implications for the DeFi recruitment and blockchain sectors, too. Any abrupt carry-trade unwind could temporarily tighten liquidity, impacting funding rounds and hiring strategies in the web3 recruitment space, where capital flows directly influence talent mobility.
Even without macro constraints, Bitcoin’s internal market structure remains fragile. Blockchain analytics firm Glassnode describes BTC as “range-bound,” with supply resistance concentrated between $93,000 and $120,000. Each attempted breakout triggers waves of loss realisation, as short-term holders sell into strength. At the same time, liquidity depth is deteriorating: Bitcoin’s aggregated 2% market depth fell nearly 30% between October and December, from around $766 million to $569 million.
ETF data corroborates this trend. In November alone, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds recorded $3.5 billion in net outflows. The so-called “buying wall” that once absorbed volatility has thinned substantially. Market participation now consists largely of existing players rotating positions rather than new investors entering the arena.
October’s surge to $126,000 effectively priced in much of the “good news” from the Fed’s pivot. Since then, the combination of shallow liquidity and residual underwater supply has kept upside momentum capped. For blockchain recruiters and crypto recruitment agencies, this dynamic hints at a more measured investment cycle heading into 2026—less about speculative hiring and more about strategic, sustained scaling.
The crypto industry has historically mirrored the liquidity environment of global markets. The infamous 2020–21 boom coincided with deep quantitative easing and negative real yields—conditions that drove extraordinary growth in digital assets and a corresponding explosion in crypto recruitment. Fast forward to today, and the difference is stark: real rates remain positive, and institutional capital is selective.
Despite modest macro easing, many blockchain startups are now prioritising operational sustainability over headcount expansion. The blockchain talent market has entered a phase where cross-disciplinary skill sets—cybersecurity, compliance, and AI integration—are gaining the most traction. As the Fed moderates policy but stops short of unleashing a full liquidity wave, hiring momentum is likely to favour companies with strong fundamentals rather than speculative projects seeking quick growth.
At Spectrum Search, we’ve observed that leading Web3 and DeFi firms are using this transitional period to build resilience. Many are realigning hiring frameworks to attract long-term “builder” profiles—engineers, web3 headhunters note—rather than short-cycle trading talent. As a result, the next expansion phase may be slower, but potentially more sustainable, reflecting the maturity of both the crypto markets and the workforce that underpins them.
The interplay between macro moderation and Bitcoin’s muted response underscores how far the crypto sector has evolved since its retail-dominated years. The Fed’s trio of rate cuts has reduced policy friction, yet the combination of still-elevated real yields, uncertain inflation data, and cautious liquidity management has kept traders grounded. Simultaneously, the BoJ’s first hike in 30 years symbolises a subtle but potentially seismic shift in risk dynamics.
For now, Bitcoin continues to behave as a semi-mature macro asset: responsive to economic data, yet stripped of its former explosiveness. Within this restrained environment lies both a risk and an opportunity—for investors, and for the growing ecosystem of web3 recruiters striving to align blockchain projects with the market’s next evolution.
As liquidity, policy, and data interplay in the final stretch of 2025, one thing is clear: crypto markets are adapting to a world no longer fuelled by extremes, but by measured recalibration. The question now is whether that patience can withstand investors’ thirst for another boom.