Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

The WazirX and Liminal Saga Unraveled: Accusations in the Cryptosphere

Unraveling the WazirX and Liminal Saga: Accusations in the Cryptosphere

The Ongoing Saga of WazirX and Liminal: A Tale of Accusations and Digital Custody

In the wake of a significant security breach that shook the foundations of the Indian cryptocurrency exchange WazirX, the WazirX and Liminal Saga continues to unfold, revealing layers of complexity involving its digital custody partner, Liminal. Amidst the turmoil of a $235 million hack reported in July, the relationship between WazirX and Liminal has come under intense scrutiny.

Liminal Responds to Accusations

On October 22, Liminal issued a statement aimed at clarifying its role and addressing what it described as a “disinformation campaign” by WazirX. The statement highlighted that despite WazirX’s allegations pointing towards Liminal for the breach, the exchange continues to utilize Liminal’s digital custody services. Astonishingly, WazirX retained more than $175 million in assets with Liminal 75 days post-hack, with around $50 million of user assets still managed through Liminal’s infrastructure.

Liminal emphasized its operational boundaries, stating that it does not have the authority to initiate transactions involving WazirXโ€™s funds. This capability rests solely with the WazirX team, which controls the execution of such transactions.

Transparency or Disinformation?

In a move tied to the ongoing debt restructuring process in Singapore, WazirX disclosed details about 240,000 wallet addresses. The exchange framed this as an effort to promote transparency and trust. However, Liminal criticised the action, suggesting WazirX may be using it as part of a disinformation campaign to confuse users and legal authorities.

The disclosure, which spanned over 1,100 pages, has ignited debates within the cryptocurrency community, raising concerns over the intentions behind such extensive data sharing.

Further Allegations from CoinSwitch Co-founder

Adding to the controversy, Ashish Singhal, co-founder of CoinSwitch, has raised alarms over WazirX’s actions post-hack. Singhal alleged that a substantial amount of WazirX’s crypto was transferred to global exchanges Bybit and KuCoin following the breach. Specifically, he claimed, “We have observed a large chunk of WazirX crypto has been moved to exchanges such as Bybit and KuCoin post the incident. Notably, we have identified the movement of $72.12 million worth of crypto to Bybit and $1.5 million funds to KuCoin.”

This revelation has escalated concerns and added another layer of complexity to the ongoing saga. As a result, the movement of funds and the transparency of WazirX’s operations have come under scrutiny, which may ultimately impact its credibility.

Looking Ahead

The situation between WazirX and Liminal highlights the intricate and often precarious nature of digital asset management and custody in the blockchain space. As the cryptocurrency community watches closely, the outcomes of this case could set precedents for security, transparency, and the operational conduct of digital exchanges.

For more insights into the challenges and strategies in managing digital assets securely, consider exploring the demand for crypto talent and navigating the decentralized future of Web3.

As the legal proceedings and investigations continue, the cryptocurrency market remains vigilant, awaiting clear resolutions and the strengthening of security measures that could redefine trust and operational standards in the digital asset exchange landscape.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Looking for your next role?
Looking to hire?